American Apparel Catalysts

  • This post examines the past catalysts that have brought American Apparel down on its knees and it explores what’s in store for 2014.
  • It is also a follow-up post to American Apparel: This Wart Looks So Perfect, in which we justify our bullish position.
  • Here we explain why we decided to participate this week in the latest round of equity funding, bringing our total long position to 3.17mm shares.

Throughout its brief history, American Apparel ($APP) has been spewing negative catalysts. First, it started with the hiring of thousands of illegal immigrants which had to be fired after the company got caught by the INS. The company paid a dear price for this value destroying action.


app chart 3 27 2014

All of this brought the company down the precipice. The stock traded down from $17 in 2008 to $.55 in 2011.

Despite getting rescue financing in 2011 (We wrote about it here) and getting back on track in 2012 and early 2013, the company faltered again in late 2013 because of execution issues at its newly minted Distribution Center (DC) located in LaMirada, management’s diverted attention away from merchandising to fixing the issues at the DC, a less vigorous youth market, and bad weather in the American Northeast. The company is now facing catastrophe once again.

So for most of its public life, American Apparel stock has been driven down by the following negative catalysts:

  • Immigration issues.
  • Bizarre behavior from the CEO of the company (Source: Media).
  • A very ugly Balance Sheet.
  • Strong dilution favoring management, and in particular the CEO.
  • Distribution Center (DC) Issues.
  • Management focus diverted to fixing DC issues instead of running the business.

At this juncture the company is facing delisting, it has raised money to pay an April debt payment, and the company is late filing its 2013 10-K. APP is as ugly as you can get.

But despite all these issues, we decided to participate in the last round of funding lead by Roth Capital. We think the worst is over for the company as we explain in this post titled American Apparel: This Wart Looks So Perfect.

The funding should allow the company to end 2014 with close to $50 million of cash on its balance sheet (B/S). This is how we derive this amount (caveat: We don’t have the 2014 1st quarter numbers yet).

Assuming $0 of cash on the (B/S) as of 3/26/2014

Equity Raise assuming over allotment options is exercised= +$32 million

2014 EBITDA guidance = +$45 million

2 times cash interest payments of $13.7 million (Source Here) = -$27.4 million

Capital Expenditures (Source: Preliminary 2013 annual results) = -$12 million

Decrease in Inventory (Source: Management) = +$12 million

Total Cash as of 12/31/2014 = +$50 million (Very rough estimate)

As investors gain confidence these numbers will be met, we believe the news flow is about to turn from negative to positive and the following catalysts are about to drive the stock much higher and investors will pay attention:

  • Distribution Center Issue resolved (Source: Management).
  • Cleaner Balance Sheet.
  • Partial debt repayment starting in late 2015.
  • Aggressive inventory reduction by 14% (Source: Management).
  • Deal dilution will somewhat weaken Dov’s control over the company and insure a more balanced approach. Investors will appreciate that.
  • Deal dilution will be counterbalanced by Charney’s performance package not meeting key milestones.
  • A more subdued Charney with a better narrative for the company. A narrative focused on what this company is doing right instead of discussing sexual harassment issues which has been baked a thousand times over.
  • The beauty of the American Apparel brand is about to become more obvious to many investors. No wonder Goldman, an APP bond holder, is playing to keep (Source Here).

A better environment will allow Charney to implement his vision. He said:

Our 247 stores could be 20% more productive with the right tweaks, the online business could double, wholesale could grow by 20% to 30%. We could even develop a $100 million third-party retail business, selling items like American Apparel nail polish at drugstores or having hooded sweatshirt blowout sales at Costco.

Using this delta over the 2012 sales baseline, American Apparel could generate between $800 million to $900 million in sales in 2017.

At $800mm in sales and EBITDA margins reaching 10%, the company could generate $.5 of EBITDA per share and see its stock reach $4 (8 * EBITDA). We are assuming a 160 million shares count (Could be higher than that). We are also assuming Charney’s anti-dilution provision will expire worthless. If they don’t, this will be the best possible scenario but we are not counting on it.

Since the company raised the necessary amount under the shelf according to our thesis, we believe the fog will lift rapidly and investors will start focusing on the bright future ahead.

Written by Michael Bigger

Disclaimer: Bigger Capital, LLC, Bigger Capital Fund, LP, Bachelier, LLC and the Bigger family own more than 3.17 million shares of American Apparel. American Apparel is a highly distressed situation and it is not suitable for the majority of investors. The likely outcome of an investment is a loss of principal. In other words, the probability of losing all your investment in this situation is very high. We have been purchasing American Apparel since May of 2011 and we have nothing to show for it. Take our opinions with a grain of salt and do your homework. 


The Latest

  • Plug Power: How Big Can It Become?
    Posted by on March 17th, 2014 at 1:26 pm

    On February 26, Plug Power ($PLUG) confirmed that the order it received on January 10 was from Wal-Mart ($WMT). To understand the importance of Wal-Mart’s role in the hydrogen market we wrote Plug Power Cracks the Hydrogen Code.

    It took about fifteen years and close to $1.0 Billion of investment for PLUG to crack the code. Throughout its life as a public company you can think of PLUG as a long-term venture investment experimenting in search of a kick-ass business model suited for a very large market opportunity. The experiment has been completed. Now in order to fully realize a venture type of return on investment, $PLUG must push the pedal to the metal on two fronts.  First, they need to leverage their position as a market leader in the hydrogen-powered material handling space to go after the established lead acid battery technology.  Second, and simultaneously as much as possible, PLUG needs to use its customer base to aggressively exploit the opportunities in adjacent markets such as airport Tuggers, Transportation Refrigeration Units (TRUs), Range Extenders (REs) and so forth.

    PLUG’s GenKey offering is miles away from any hydrogen fuel cell competition.  From a strategic point of view, the validation its clients (for example, Wal-Mart) provide reduces its sales cycle. PLUG has now great relationships with industry leaders, which makes GenKey a much easier decision for prospective new customers and existing customers alike.  Also, these relationships should insulate it from competitors for years to come. We believe the latest Wal-Mart deal confirms the solution-market thesis. This became clear to us when Wal-Mart chief of distribution logistic presented via a video webcast at the analyst day in Albany, NY in December. I don’t remember the bearish bloggers attending this conference…

    When we first bought stock in this company at $0.23, we knew it had potential.  When it hit an intraday high of $11.72 on March 11, the market cap soared to $1.2Bn.  Of course the bearish bloggers had a field day with this, but we feel this raises the key question: How Big Can Plug Become?  To answer this question, one must assess the size of the current opportunity and its position in the competitive landscape. Its leadership position in hydrogen power can’t be denied.

    Let’s see if we can figure out how big this opportunity can be on a global basis. The latest management presentations give us some important metrics that we can use to assess the total global opportunity.

    Material Handling Market (GenKey offering: Batteries, Molecule, Service, Infrastructure: Source internal calculation): 6,000,000 global units at $6000 of revenues per year per unit over the lifetime of battery = $36 Billion per annum = maximum boundary condition (Total potential US market for GenKey product).

    Tuggers (Source: management): Could be a $60 million business for $PLUG. This is by far the smallest opportunity.

    Transportation Refrigeration Units (TRU’s) (Source: management): $15 billion+

    Range Extenders (RE’s) for battery-operated vehicles (Source: management): $10 billion +

    Other Adjacent Markets: Unknown, but there is potential.  As an example, range extenders could eventually make electric vehicles more practical for longer distance travel.

    The total market opportunity for $PLUG is $61 billion +.

    Now let’s calculate how big the annual Wal-Mart opportunity is:

    Wal-Mart has 117 Distribution Center (DCs) in The US (Source: Internet). 100 of the DCs can be converted using the GenKey solution. We know that over a period of 6 years each DC represents a $9 million revenue opportunity for PLUG (Source: Management). Therefore the total US Wal-Mart opportunity is $150 million a year. That is 1 client and we know PLUG has now more than 24 clients, most of them located in the US.

    At a market valuation of $700 million, Plug is valued 4.7 times its WMT annual potential revenue opportunity. WMT owns less than 0.5% of the global number of forklift (6,000,000 units: Source Management)

    Let’s look at the total potential just with existing customers.  As of December, existing PLUG customers (including WMT, SYY, and KR) owned about 250,000 total forklift trucks, of which only 4000 were PLUG powered trucks  The remaining 246,000 trucks could all present the “low hanging fruit” opportunity for PLUG.  Assuming a lifespan of 6 years (PLUG’s management says about 6-10 years depending on usage), the revenue opportunity is $1.6bn / year … and that is without acquiring a single new customer.

    Some investors will start focusing on P/E, EV to EBITDA, and all sorts of metrics to value PLUG. We think that for the time being these methods will blind investors. PLUG should be priced more like a venture capital investment in relation to its potential market and its leading position.

    Short-term or momentum traders have gotten involved in the stock given the run-up since December.  While this has certainly brought attention to the company, the volatility is unsettling for some investors.

    The company will look expensive for probably this decade and its rate of growth should explode very soon. This could be a $10 billion company in 10 to 15 years.

    Written by Michael Bigger.

    Disclaimer: Bigger Capital, LLC, Bigger Capital Fund, LP, Bachelier, LLC and the Bigger family hold a very large stake in Plug Power. We have a very long term horizon that differs from the majority of investors. These high growth situation are often not suitable for most investors since they are extremely volatile and can realize their full potential over decades.

  • American Apparel: This Wart Looks So Perfect
    Posted by on February 25th, 2014 at 10:10 am

    This post should be complemented by all the research we have performed on the company since April 2011.

    Back in 2011 when we first started writing about American Apparel ($APP), the stock was trading just below $1. The company had just received rescue financing of $15mm to avoid bankruptcy. The company could not re-negotiate its debt agreements, sales were stagnant, and the situation was highly distressed. We believed that the chance for the company to refinance was high because we thought sales were about to start expanding and there were enough inefficiencies in the operations for meaningful EBITDA improvements even without major sales growth. We also expected the company to reduce inventory decreasing the amount of working capital needed.  At the time we hypothesized that over a 2 to 4 years period these improvements could allow them to pay down a good chunk of their debt, reducing interest expense substantially. 

    In addition, we saw the potential of EBITDA margin expanding to a 15 to 20% boundary condition (Source: Charney TV interviews) as it benefits from harvesting its lighter capital sales channels and with sales increasing to $800 million or higher, it allows the company to leverage its fixed cost asset (manufacturing) on a larger number of units.

    In 2012 sales improved to $616mm and adjusted EBITDA reached $36.6mm for a 6% EBITDA Margin. In early 2013 the company refinanced its high cost debt. The stock took off and traded as high as $2.40.

    The company implemented two important strategic initiatives in 2013: 

    • Elimination of the inventory room at the store level to increase sale space and reduce cost.
    • Implementation of a new state of the art distribution center (DC) at LaMirada, Los Angeles to support its three business lines efficiently. 

    In addition, the company completed its roll-out of the RFID system and its implementation of the Oracle ATG Web Commerce Customer Service application for its e-commerce platform in 2013.

    The implementation of these strategic initiatives has had a depressing effect on the 2013 baseline EBITDA forecast. At the end of Q2 2013, management’s EBITDA forecast was reduced to $46 to $51mm from $47 to $54 million because of a $4.3mm cost impact from the transition to the new DC. We can’t quantify the impact of the RFID implementation nor the backroom elimination. Therefore a normal adjusted EBITDA for 2013 baseline remains at $47 to $54 million on sales of $655mm for an EBITDA Margin of 7.8%.

    In late 2013, the company was hit on two fronts. First, the distribution center going live proved to be harder than expected for the company. It just did not work as planned and as a result the company could not deliver merchandise to the stores on time. The result was lost sales and a negative delta impact of $13 million on EBITDA year-to-date 9/31/2013.  The company cancelled its guidance for the rest of 2013 which stood at $46 million to $51 million as of Q2 2013.

    In addition, the youth retail segment has been challenged recently which has dragged sales further down.

    On December 13, the company filed a shelf for 50,000,000 common shares. To this date the company has not issued shares. On February 10, Sapna Maheswari published this interview of Charney that led us to lower our probability of a meaningful (>= $25 million) equity raise taking place.

    On February 4, 2014 the stock plunged to $.85.

    On February 20, some news outlets reported that some American Apparel’s creditors hired legal counsel to represent them in a restructuring of the company. It was also reported that American Apparel hired Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP to represent them in such negotiation. Charney denied that report, saying in an interview that Skadden has been the company’s outside counsel for years and it’s a “mischaracterization that they have been engaged as a restructuring firm.” The firm is currently in a quiet period and it can’t say more than this. Skadden has been American Apparel legal firm for a long time. The 2012 shareholder meeting was held at Skadden offices in New York city.

    On this news the stock plummeted to $.55. At this level, the stock was currently trading at two time normalized EBITDA. The market is according a high probability that the company will seek bankruptcy soon. We believe that the maximum leverage ratio (Adjusted EBITDA as denominator) of the credit line covenant is problematic at the moment. The company will be reporting 4th quarter 2013 results within a few weeks. We are therefore in the dark as to what the numbers look like for basically a five month period. As of 9/30/13, the leverage ratio was between 5.75x and 6.0x, and it is likely it will shake out in that range for the quarter ended 12/31/13.  Unless EBITDA grows significantly in the current quarter ending 3/31/14, the leverage trigger will be a problem at the end of this quarter but we believe the company will get a waiver. 





    Closing Date through March 31, 2013


    7.35 to 1.00

    April 1, 2013 through June 30, 2013


    6.50 to 1.00

    July 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013


    6.25 to 1.00

    October 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013


    6.00 to 1.00

    January 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014


    5.75 to 1.00

    April 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014


    5.50 to 1.00

    July 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014


    5.25 to 1.00

    January 1, 2015 through March 31, 2015


    5.00 to 1.00

    April 1, 2015 through June 30, 2015


    4.75 to 1.00

    July 1, 2015 and thereafter


    4.50 to 1.00


    The bond’s covenant calls for no more than 4.5x leverage (debt – cash) / EBITDA.  We believe the company failed to meet the covenant as of 12/31/13, the interest increased by 2% PIK. It goes without saying that there is much upside to reduce this burden once the business stabilizes. 

    Putting aside the credit issue for a moment…

    American Apparel major strategic initiatives, which were highly disruptive in 2013, have been completed. While the operational risks still exist, we think a lot of the challenges of these integrations are now behind the company, yet the benefits of these initiatives and the reduced operational risk are not reflected in the current stock price. So if you look beyond the fog and include the benefits of these initiatives into your assessment of the business, the thesis becomes much more compelling now than it was in April 2011.

    Here is why in detail:


    • Despite the fulfillment issues, 2013 total sales increased 3% to $634 million and the company also stated that the negative impact of the distribution center issues should not affect 2014 results. 
    • Although integration of the new center did not go as smoothly as management forecasted, the new facility is now in place and should allow the company to reduce inventory while leveraging more effectively the advantage of local manufacturing and vertical integration. We believe it should save the company about $5 million in cost a year.
    • The cost savings from the backroom elimination in the stores are estimated to be $10 million in 2014. (based on our assumption: Elimination of two employees per store, $20m per employee on a 250 store count basis)
    • The savings from the new RFID system is expected to be $1 to $2 million.
    • These efforts will result in about $13 to $17 million (conservative estimate) in annual EBITDA improvement starting in sometime in 2014 over the 2013 forecast baseline.

    Our baseline 2014 EBITDA Forecast stands at $57 million to $71 million for an EBITDA margin of 8.9%. Annual Interest Expense should come in at around $36 Million in cash. We believe Capex will come in at $17 million. This forecast assumes little sales growth over initial 2013 sales forecast and no benefit from increased sales resulting from the additional selling space at the store level. 

    How will American Apparel look in 2014 and beyond?

    During this interview Dov Charney admits that the company is in a retrenching mode after experiencing the issues in 2013. Charney plans on polishing and fine tuning its operations in 2014.  He does not expect as much growth for the next 1 to 2 years. We appreciate the fact that Charney admitted that he is his worst own enemy. We welcome the candor and we are convinced Charney remains a manic about engineering a differentiated apparel business model that will carry this brand forward for years to come. Most of the pieces are coming together.

    Here we are in 2014 with American Apparel stock trading at $0.70 – basically a level 30% lower than our cost basis which we have accumulated since April 2011. But so much has been accomplished by the company in these last 2 years. If the company can manage its debt issue, we believe management would be in a great position to focus on fine tuning the model, connecting with its customers, experimenting and paying down debt.

    Assuming a fully diluted share count of 160 million, the company could generate 38 cents of EBITDA per share in 2014. The stock is currently trading at 2 times this level. We believe this stock could trade at up to 10 times (boundary condition) this level in two to 3 years as investors gain conviction that the worst is over for the company. A while back I wrote a blog post about distressed apparel companies.  In that post, I observed that when a recovery is realized, top brand apparel companies can trade up to 10x to 15x EBITDA. 

    We believe American Apparel is a top of the mind brand in its youth target market. This video provides a clue as to why we believe so.

    During Sapna Maheshwari interview of Charney, he said:

    Our 247 stores could be 20% more productive with the right tweaks, the online business could double, wholesale could grow by 20% to 30%. We could even develop a $100 million third-party retail business, selling items like American Apparel nail polish at drugstores or having hooded sweatshirt blowout sales at Costco.

    Using this delta over the 2013 sales baseline, American Apparel could generate between $800 million to $900 million in sales in 2017.

    At $800mm in sales and EBITDA margins reaching 15% to 20%, we could see the stock price reach $7.   

    We think that if the company raises a token amount under the shelf to help it through the seasonally slower first half of 2014, the fog will lift rapidly and investors will start focusing on the bright future ahead.

    We also believe that given all the cash management can squeeze out of operation, the company will get a waiver on its credit line if it needs to.

    Written by Michael Bigger with the help of Jennifer Galperin.  

    Many thanks to my friends who have provided feedback on this post.

    Disclaimer: Bigger Capital, LLC, Bigger Capital Fund, LP, Bachelier, LLC and the Bigger family own more than 1 million shares in American Apparel. We intend to increase our position opportunistically.

    American Apparel is a highly distressed situation and it is not suitable for the majority of investors. The likely outcome of an investment is a loss of principal. In other words, the probability of losing all your investment in this situation is very high. 

    We have been purchasing American Apparel since May of 2011 and we have nothing to show for it. Take our opinions with a grain of salt and do your homework.  

  • Blogging American Apparel
    Posted by on January 7th, 2014 at 12:31 pm

    We wrote our first post about American Apparel ($APP) on May 6, 2011. We view blogging as embracing entropy. By this I mean, the activity is more like throwing a handful of seeds in the air and see what takes hold overtime. When we go into it we have no assumption about what is about to take place. We have no clue really, but we embrace the pursuit of throwing seeds in the air. You just never know.

    I often push the exercise further by reminding our trading group that we know nothing as a group and in order to discover profitable ideas we start with experimentation with no pre-conceived notion about the situation at hand. That is the upside of studying Physics — Learning you know nothing very fast.

    We just don’t know, like we didn’t know what would happen with the American Apparel series of posts. But yesterday, I got rewarded handsomely for all the hard work we put into the American Apparel ($APP) situation. 

    I was approached by an analyst at a firm that has a significant position in the name. I can’t say more than this about who it is. He wanted to talk to us about American Apparel ($APP) after he read all our material on the company.

    Our conversation was one of the most enlightening conversation I have had in ages. He knows the company inside out and it showed he had put a lot of work into it. Actually, much more than we did. You see, I don’t get turned on about how stock prices move or how a chart looks like or what have you. I crave talking about the business, the customers, the products, the strategy, and so forth.

    I like talking about its valuation and how big can this company be in 10 year, 20 years down the road. I like to mentally imagine the trajectory of the business at very long time scale.

    Yesterday, I was like a kid in a candy store. I could have talked about the business for days. I could have listened to this analyst talk about the business for days. It was that exciting. Having this type of conversation helps me validate my investment ideas and get confidence to go in big when it makes sense.

    All the blogging we do helps us connect with other individuals.  Sometimes it takes a while to get the reward for the work, but it is usually worth it.

    Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits

  • Blackberry: The Good, The Bad, and the Shift in Momentum
    Posted by on January 7th, 2014 at 11:33 am


    If we can agree on one thing related to $BBRY, it is that everyone has an opinion.  There are a lot of topics keeping the bulls and bears talking.

    The good:

    • Shift in focus to the secure email and enterprise security, through internal growth and potentially acquisitions.
    • Dividing the company into operating units: Enterprise Services, Messaging, QNX Embedded, and Devices.  This allows each unit to grow the business independently and sets up the possibility to spin off one or more units if a good opportunity arrises.
    • New CEO has a proven track record for turnarounds.
    • The company now has $3Bn in cash on the balance sheet plus access to an undrawn credit facility of about $250mm.
    • New head of Devices business hired from Sony/Ericsson.
    • The new convert provided $1Bn in additional liquidity at 6% interest with a conversion price of $10.  The investor has until Jan 13 to exercise an option to purchase an additional $250mm of the convert.  Note that the option was extended from mid-December (that should go under the bad).
    • The convert was issued to Fairfax in lieu of an original plan to buy the company for $9 / share.

    The bad:

    • Co-founder Michael Lazaridis just sold his position down to <5%
    • Just announced an asset impairment of $2.7Bn and a reduction in inventory value of [?], primarily B10 devices.  Additional inventory writedowns are possible.
    • Revenues continue to decline across operating units.

    To evaluate an investment in $BBRY, these factors are all irrelevant.  They are all in the past.  All this information is priced into the stock.  In fact, a lot of the bad news was priced in ahead of the earnings announcement so that the actual announcement produced a positive spike in the stock.    

    The critical question is, what (if anything) will be the catalyst for a stock price recovery?  Some investors hope that is the Foxconn deal.  The partnership will help avoid some of the inventory risk issues $BBRY is currently dealing with, which is a positive for the company.  In addition, the deal allows BBRY to focus on other areas of the company where it has a competitive advantage, such as secure email and messaging.  The catalyst could be a change in attitude about the stock due to the CEO and the new deal.  Positive news improves the company’s image which can come around to improve revenues and results.  We can’t be sure what the catalyst will be at this point.  One thing is for sure, it feels like there is a lot of strength in the stock since the announcement. 

    On this name in particular, there is a good amount of upside if the company is able to turn around its image and deal with the many issues around mostly the hardware.  The stock could double to the $15 range.  There is also a good amount of risk to the downside if they are unable to succeed with the turnaround plan.  It feels like a binary situation where either (a) they are able to turn around and the stock doubles (or more), or (b) they can’t turn things around and the stock price plummets.  Given all the hype, there is likely to be a lot of volatility.  In these types of situations, I think options offer the best value proposition.  I am long the Jan ‘15 $7 calls.

    How are you playing Blackberry?  

    Written by Jennifer Galperin.  Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits.

  • Plug Power Cracks the Hydrogen Code
    Posted by on December 6th, 2013 at 2:23 pm

    Bruno Forget of Air Liquide gave one of the most insightful presentation at the Plug Power ($PLUG) Analyst Conference held on December 4th in Albany, NY.

    He described the fuell cell hydrogen business as being a research experiment for most of the nineties until about 2009. Back then, there was no commercial opportunities to extend a single project into a viable recurring commercial opportunity.

    He proclaimed that it was Plug Power that cracked the commercial fuel cell opportunity when it won a deal to implement its Gen-Drive solution at a new Wal-Mart ($WMT) distribution center in Canada.

    Then he said:

    $WMT is about data and return on investment. It measures everything.

    Forget knew then that this was a big deal that was about to change the whole business dynamics. He was so excited about it that he thought that Air Liquide should invest in this company. He got rejected from the get-go. Air Liquide is a big company. It does not move that quickly.

    $WMT added the $PLUG solution to an existing facility in Balzac, Ontario. It replaced its existing lead battery solution with $PLUG’s GenDrive solution.

    Then $PLUG proceeded to win more $WMT distribution centers business in the USA. Then it won a bunch of business from the like of Kroger ($KR), FedEx ($FDX), BMW, Mercedes Benz and so forth. You can find the more comprehensive list here. Forget grew more excited than ever and he kept on pushing.

    That lead Forget to conclude: 


    That is when I almost fell of my chair listening to Forget.

    Now you know why Air Liquide decided to invest when the company faced liquidity issues in early 2013, after a botched financing attempt during which shortsellers front ran the stock.

    Consider this: Who will get a big chunk of this $20 billion opportunity in the USA alone? That is just forklift and it does not include all the adjacent markets….tuggers, TRUS, range extenders, and so forth.

    Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits.

    Disclaimer: Bigger Capital, LLC, Bigger Capital Fund, LP, Bachelier, LLC and the Bigger family hold millions of shares of Plug Power. We intend to increase our position if the company’s results track our benchmark.

    Plug Power is a highly distressed situation and it is not suitable for the majority of investors. The likely outcome of an investment is a loss of principal.


  • Plug Power Conference Call – The Breakout Picture
    Posted by on November 18th, 2013 at 9:46 am

    On November 14, Plug Power (PLUG) reported its Q3 results and held its Q3 2013 earnings call. Andy Marsh, PLUG’s CEO, surprised Wall Street by announcing $14 million of new booking since October 8. I want to point out the major insights I uncovered while reading the release and listening to the call.

    • The big driver for the increase in booking was an order from Kroger for 201 GenDrive units with a service component attached to it. If we assume two third of the booking since October 8 is from this order than Kroger did a $9 million deal with PLUG. That works to about $46,000 per Gen-Drive unit. We know that on average a Gen-Drive unit costs about $16,000. Service becomes a very large portion of this contract. This bodes well for PLUG, because the service addition gives us confidence that PLUG is in a position to see revenues swell above the break even mark of about $55 million in 2014. In addition, this is the second Kroger distribution center win for PLUG. Kroger is sold on the PLUG solution and there is no reason why PLUG can’t win a significant chunk of all of its 34 distribution centers conversion if Kroger decide to go all in. The total Kroger Distribution Center opportunity is about $300 million recurring over a 5 to 6 years period. If you doubt the importance of fuel cells for Kroger check out page 43 of the Kroger Factbook.
    • Bridgestone was the second customer of PLUG Power Gen Drive solution. They have used Gen Drive for over 6 years in their automated ground vehicles (AGV). These units run 24/7 and can lift up to 40,000 pounds for 21-plus hours a day. They have decided to renew this fleet with a Gen-Drive solution. This is another testimony of the superiority of the PLUG solution. This is something PLUG can bring on the road to win more contracts and win new customers.
    • Marsh said: I’m expecting a blowout number of orders in the fourth quarter as we start to close some of these multi-site deals and gain new customers win. When Philip Shen of Roth Capital asked: You’ve already had a really nice Q4 for booking. How much better can it get? Marsh responded:It easily could be 2 to 3 times higher. Shen exlcaimed: WOW!

    On December 4th, PLUG will hold an Analyst meeting in Latham, NY to update analysts on these deals and new customers wins. I will be attending the meeting and can’t wait to give you an update.

    Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits

    Disclaimer: Bigger Capital, LLC, Bigger Capital Fund, LP, Bachelier, LLC and the Bigger family hold millions of shares of Plug Power. We intend to increase our position if the company’s results track our benchmark.

    Plug Power is a highly distressed situation and it is not suitable for the majority of investors. The likely outcome of an investment is a loss of principal. 

  • Introducing Take This Bet!
    Posted by on October 14th, 2013 at 5:12 pm

    How do I play?

    Take This Bet is a fun and easy stock picking game that you play with your friends on twitter.

    When you start a game, the game will track the performance of $100 invested in your stock and $100 shorted in your opponent stock. Your opponent will be invited to take the opposite of this bet via twitter. Win bragging rights and may the best trader win. No money is at stake. Here is a video that shows you how to play:


  • Trading Outperformance
    Posted by on October 4th, 2013 at 2:35 pm

    In our latest video, I go through the concept of outperformance of one security versus another. Specifically, I look at $AAPL versus &AMZN.  You can look at the relative performance of those two stocks on a dollar-neutral basis here.  
    If you think one stock will perform better relative to another stock (or an ETF), try trading a dollar-neutral spread to capture that exact performance metric.  Each time you think about entering a long trade in one stock, think about what your long stock will outperform.  Is it cash?  Or is it the broader market, a sector ETF, or another stock in a similar (or different) industry?  No matter what it is, you can use a $spread to implement your views. We have even created a series of videos to help you achieve your objectives.
    Happy Trading!
    Written and produced by Jennifer Galperin.  Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits.

  • Why We Traded Ugly J. C. Penney
    Posted by on October 2nd, 2013 at 10:55 am

    Last Friday we bought J. C. Penney for our trading account. Many of you asked: Can’t you find something easier to trade?

    Do you want to look at the ugliest stock chart? Look at jcpenny

    My answer to this question is that at times my subconscious override my rational and we will allow to do insanity trades as long as the size is reasonable.

    Maybe, there is something in the back of our minds that gets aroused by high potential trading energy and high entropy situations. The ugliest charts on the block are the most interesting for us.

    We will probably lose money on this situation, but overall we have done pretty well going on dates with ugly.

    The chart below is a dollar neutral $XRT $JCP $spread and it gives a few clues about the Physics of the $JCP situation.

    Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits.